FIRST US BANCSHARES, INC. (FUSB)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- EPS and profitability compressed on elevated credit costs: diluted EPS fell to $0.03 and net income to $0.2M as provision for credit losses surged to $2.7M, driven by indirect consumer loan growth, higher net charge-offs, and specific reserves on two commercial credits .
- Core earnings power held: net interest income rose 6.5% QoQ to $9.48M, NIM expanded 6 bps to 3.59%, and PPNR was stable at $2.9M (up 0.9% QoQ), helping preserve operating momentum despite higher provisions .
- Balance sheet growth and funding mix: total loans grew 2.7% QoQ (5.9% YTD), led by indirect consumer and multifamily; deposits increased 2.6% QoQ with use of brokered CDs; short‑term borrowings of $35M supported liquidity while repricing deposits lower .
- Asset quality mixed: NPA ratio improved to 0.33%, but net charge‑offs rose to 0.79% of average loans, including a $1.2M partial charge‑off on a commercial loan and higher indirect consumer charge‑offs .
- No sell‑side consensus available; comparisons vs. Wall Street estimates are unavailable for Q2 2025; dividend maintained at $0.07 per share . Consensus unavailable per S&P Global.*
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- NIM and net interest income improved: NIM rose to 3.59% from 3.53% and net interest income increased to $9.48M, supported by higher average loan volumes and yields on loans/investments .
- Loan growth accelerated: total loans up $23.1M QoQ (2.7%), with strong indirect consumer (+$25.1M) and multifamily (+$12.4M); average loans rose to $857.7M (vs. $824.5M in Q1) .
- PPNR resiliency: PPNR of $2.88M was up QoQ and YoY; management highlighted this as a base for future performance .
-
What Went Wrong
- Credit costs spiked: provision for credit losses was $2.7M (vs. $0.5M in Q1 and none in Q2’24), including $1.4M tied to indirect consumer and $0.9M for two individually evaluated commercial loans .
- Charge‑offs increased: net charge‑offs/avg loans climbed to 0.79% (from 0.13% in Q1 and 0.10% in Q2’24), with indirect consumer charge‑offs at $0.6M and a $1.2M commercial partial charge‑off .
- Efficiency deteriorated: efficiency ratio rose to 72.1% (from 70.8% in Q1), reflecting higher salaries/benefits and professional fees, pressuring bottom‑line performance .
Financial Results
Context and Drivers:
- Provision detail: $1.4M tied to indirect consumer, $0.9M in specific reserves on two commercial loans; remainder from macro forecasts and unfunded commitments .
- Charge-offs: $1.2M partial charge‑off on a single commercial loan; indirect net charge‑offs $0.6M (vs. $0.3M in Q1 and Q2’24) .
- PPNR: $2.88M in Q2 2025 vs. $2.85M in Q1 2025 and $2.74M in Q2 2024 .
Guidance Changes
Management did not issue revenue, margin, expense, or tax rate guidance; dividend policy unchanged this quarter .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No earnings call transcript was available in the documents reviewed; management commentary is sourced from the press release/8‑K .
Management Commentary
- “We recorded a significant provision for credit losses associated with growth in indirect consumer lending, combined with an uptick in net charge-offs in the category, as well as the application of additional reserves on two individually evaluated commercial loans.” — James F. House, President & CEO .
- “We are encouraged by increases in both net interest margin and total loans during the quarter… NIM expanded by six basis points… total loans grew by 2.7%… PPNR also increased by 0.9% QoQ and by 5.2% YoY.” .
- Liquidity and capital remained sound; Tier 1 leverage 9.23% and readily available liquidity of $384M support growth and operations .
Q&A Highlights
No Q2 2025 earnings call transcript was available in the filings and press releases reviewed; management communications for the quarter were delivered via the earnings press release and 8‑K .
Estimates Context
There were no published sell‑side consensus estimates for Q2 2025 EPS or revenue for FUSB; comparisons vs. Wall Street consensus are unavailable as of the report date. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Credit costs are the swing factor: a sizable provision and higher net charge‑offs drove the EPS downdraft; watch indirect consumer credit performance and the two flagged commercial loans for normalization risk or additional reserve needs .
- Core earnings capacity is intact: NIM and net interest income improved and PPNR was steady to up; if credit costs normalize, earnings power should inflect positively .
- Growth engine remains indirect and multifamily: continued origination momentum with prime‑quality scores (weighted average new indirect FICO ~798 YTD) supports balances; but requires vigilant credit monitoring as the cycle evolves .
- Funding and liquidity are well‑positioned: deposit growth and brokered CDs balanced with short‑term borrowings; readily available liquidity of $384M and stable capital ratios provide flexibility .
- Operating efficiency slipped: elevated expenses lifted the efficiency ratio; continued discipline on salaries and professional fees will matter for incremental operating leverage .
- Dividend maintained: $0.07/share underscores confidence in capital and liquidity while earnings absorb near‑term credit costs .
- No Street coverage: absence of consensus reduces estimate‑driven volatility; stock may trade on internal credit updates and NIM trajectory rather than quarterly beats/misses. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
References:
- Q2 2025 8‑K and Exhibit 99.1 press release, including financial tables and CEO commentary .
- Q2 2025 press release distribution (PRNewswire) mirroring exhibit content .
- Q1 2025 press release for sequential trends .
- Q4 2024 8‑K and press release for prior‑year comparisons and context .
Footnote: *Values retrieved from S&P Global.